Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/John R. Peeples, Jr. v. North Charleston City Police Officer R.T. Simoncavage, His Partner John Smith, Four to Eight Other Officers, John Doe, Richard Roe, Etc., North Charleston City Judge W. Robert Kinard, and Charleston Air Force Base Security Police Sgt. Brian W. Hensley and City of North Charleston Air Force Base
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 548565
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
John R. Peeples, Jr. v. North Charleston City Police Officer R.T. Simoncavage, His Partner John Smith, Four to Eight Other Officers, John Doe, Richard Roe, Etc., North Charleston City Judge W. Robert Kinard, and Charleston Air Force Base Security Police Sgt. Brian W. Hensley and City of North Charleston Air Force Base
No. 548565 · Decided October 15, 1990
No. 548565·Fourth Circuit · 1990·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
October 15, 1990
Citation
No. 548565
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
John R. Peeples, Jr. v. North Charleston City Police Officer R.T. Simoncavage, His Partner John Smith, Four to Eight Other Officers, John Doe, Richard Roe, Etc., North Charleston City Judge W. Robert Kinard, and Charleston Air Force Base Security Police Sgt. Brian W. Hensley and City of North Charleston Air Force Base is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for John R. Peeples, Jr. v. North Charleston City Police Officer R.T. Simoncavage, His Partner John Smith, Four to Eight Other Officers, John Doe, Richard Roe, Etc., North Charleston City Judge W. Robert Kinard, and Charleston Air Force Base Security Police Sgt. Brian W. Hensley and City of North Charleston Air Force Base in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 15, 1990.
Use the citation No. 548565 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.