FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10379955
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joan Cicchiello v. Ms. Slinka

No. 10379955 · Decided April 15, 2025
No. 10379955 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 15, 2025
Citation
No. 10379955
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6005 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6005 JOAN CICCHIELLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. SLINKA, Individually and official capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00123-GMG-RWT) Submitted: April 10, 2025 Decided: April 15, 2025 Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joan Cicchiello, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6005 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/15/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joan Cicchiello appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint because she did not file it on a court-approved form. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. At the district court’s instruction, Cicchiello refiled her complaint on the appropriate form and the district court clerk docketed the complaint under a new civil action number. Cicchiello’s new complaint is currently pending in the district court. See Cicchiello v. Slinka, N.D. W. Va. No. 3:24-cv-00152-GMG-RWT. Thus, Cicchiello suffered no prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Cicchiello v. Slinka, No. 3:24-cv-00123-GMG-RWT (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 19, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6005 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6005 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Joan Cicchiello v. Ms. Slinka in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 15, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10379955 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →