FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10644716
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jessiah Hubbard v. Jeffrey Jackson

No. 10644716 · Decided July 29, 2025
No. 10644716 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
July 29, 2025
Citation
No. 10644716
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6118 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6118 JESSIAH JAMES HUBBARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFREY NEALE JACKSON, North Carolina Department of Justice; JAYLA COLE, North Carolina Department of Justice; SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS; PAUL C. RIDGEWAY, Superior Court Division; CLAIRE V. HILL, Superior Court Division; NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Tort Claims Court, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:24-ct-03272-BO-RJ) Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jessiah James Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6118 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jessiah James Hubbard appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), ∗ and the denial of nondispositive motions as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that absolute immunity, Eleventh Amendment immunity, and prosecutorial immunity barred Hubbard’s claims, or in the court’s denial of Johnson’s remaining motions as moot. Because we affirm on immunity grounds, we need not reach the court’s alternative reasoning. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ The district court’s order is final and appealable because the court did not grant leave to amend. Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order). 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6118 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6118 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jessiah Hubbard v. Jeffrey Jackson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 29, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10644716 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →