Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/Jane Greer Kelly, Individually And/or in Any Fiduciary Capacity, and as Legal Guardian and Custodian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually, Preston Corporation and Preston Public Service Corporation v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 275831
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jane Greer Kelly, Individually And/or in Any Fiduciary Capacity, and as Legal Guardian and Custodian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually, Preston Corporation and Preston Public Service Corporation v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually
No. 275831 · Decided April 18, 1967
No. 275831·Fourth Circuit · 1967·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 18, 1967
Citation
No. 275831
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Jane Greer Kelly, Individually And/or in Any Fiduciary Capacity, and as Legal Guardian and Custodian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually, Preston Corporation and Preston Public Service Corporation v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jane Greer Kelly, Individually And/or in Any Fiduciary Capacity, and as Legal Guardian and Custodian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually, Preston Corporation and Preston Public Service Corporation v. Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, by Richard Aubrey Raese, Their Duly Authorized Legal Guardian Richard Aubrey Raese, as Legal Guardian of Richard Greer Raese and John Reeves Raese, Infants, and Richard Aubrey Raese, Individually in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 18, 1967.
Use the citation No. 275831 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.