FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10587525
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Wynn v. Annette Watkins Harris

No. 10587525 · Decided May 19, 2025
No. 10587525 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2025
Citation
No. 10587525
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2207 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2207 JAMES ERIC WYNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANNETTE D. WATKINS HARRIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00366-RCY) Submitted: May 15, 2025 Decided: May 19, 2025 Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Eric Wynn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-2207 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James Eric Wynn appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) his amended civil complaint * and the court’s orders dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wynn’s informal brief, as supplemented, does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The district court’s dismissal order is final and appealable because the court did not grant further leave to amend. Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order). 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2207 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2207 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for James Wynn v. Annette Watkins Harris in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10587525 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →