FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10666409
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jack Moore v. Elizabeth Thomas

No. 10666409 · Decided September 3, 2025
No. 10666409 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 3, 2025
Citation
No. 10666409
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6122 JACK P. MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ELIZABETH HOPKINS THOMAS, DIR. N.C. PRISONER’S LEGAL SER. (OR REPLACEMENT), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00291-CCE-JEP) Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025 Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jack P. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jack P. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion for appointment of counsel following the court’s prior order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Moore’s complaint without prejudice and with leave to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Moore seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s pending motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jack Moore v. Elizabeth Thomas in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 3, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10666409 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →