Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10666409
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jack Moore v. Elizabeth Thomas
No. 10666409 · Decided September 3, 2025
No. 10666409·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 3, 2025
Citation
No. 10666409
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6122
JACK P. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ELIZABETH HOPKINS THOMAS, DIR. N.C. PRISONER’S LEGAL SER. (OR
REPLACEMENT),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00291-CCE-JEP)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack P. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jack P. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion for
appointment of counsel following the court’s prior order adopting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Moore’s complaint without prejudice and with leave
to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Moore seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s pending motions and dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(1:23-cv-00291-CCE-JEP) Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025 Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
03Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
04USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jack P.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6122 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jack Moore v. Elizabeth Thomas in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 3, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10666409 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.