FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10371590
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Xavier Earquhart

No. 10371590 · Decided April 1, 2025
No. 10371590 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 1, 2025
Citation
No. 10371590
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1187 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1187 In re: XAVIER MILTON EARQUHART, a/k/a Xavier Smart, a/k/a Xavier Akpan Smart, a/k/a Xzavier Erquhart, a/k/a Xzayvier Ernhart, a/k/a David Imrich, a/k/a Kevin Liols, a/k/a Michael Powell, a/k/a Melvin Hailstones, a/k/a Rety Humos, a/k/a Milton Monn, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:17-cr-00134-FL-1; 5:23-cv-00722-FL) Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: April 1, 2025 Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Xavier Milton Earquhart, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1187 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Xavier Milton Earquhart petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and other motions related thereto. Earquhart seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. However, upon review, the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. ∗ We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED ∗ While we deny mandamus relief at this juncture, we encourage the district court to act as expeditiously as possible in this matter. 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1187 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1187 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for In re: Xavier Earquhart in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 1, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10371590 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →