FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10371592
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Karsten Allen

No. 10371592 · Decided April 1, 2025
No. 10371592 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 1, 2025
Citation
No. 10371592
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1137 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1137 In re: KARSTEN OBED ALLEN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. (7:22-cv-00408-JHY-CKM) Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: April 1, 2025 Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karsten Obed Allen, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1137 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: In this petition for a writ of mandamus, Karsten Obed Allen alleges that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a court order related to legal materials, which Allen filed in the underlying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. See Allen v. Shelton, No. 7:22-cv-00408-JHY-CKM (W.D. Va., PACER No. 128). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge denied this motion by order entered on February 7, 2025. See Allen, PACER No. 140. Because the district court has recently denied the motion underlying this petition, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1137 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1137 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for In re: Karsten Allen in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 1, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10371592 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →