FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10588422
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Harrey Brown v. United States

No. 10588422 · Decided May 20, 2025
No. 10588422 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
May 20, 2025
Citation
No. 10588422
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1233 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1233 HARREY ANTHONY BROWN; KESHA LYNETTE BROWN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee, and BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER (BAMC); ATTENDING DR. GEORGE J. KALLINGAL; ATTENDING DR. ALEXANDER ERNEST; RESIDENT DR. GRACE E. PARK, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:21-cv-03801-DCN) Submitted: May 15, 2025 Decided: May 20, 2025 Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1233 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 2 of 3 Harrey Anthony Brown, Kesha Lynette Brown, Appellants Pro Se. William Hammond Jordan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 USCA4 Appeal: 25-1233 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Harrey Anthony Brown and Kesha Lynette Brown seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motions to reconsider the denials of various pretrial motions and for evidentiary hearing. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Appellants’ motion to expedite and grant the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1233 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1233 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Harrey Brown v. United States in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 20, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10588422 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →