Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10665530
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Guy Craig v. KrunchCash, LLC
No. 10665530 · Decided September 2, 2025
No. 10665530·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 2, 2025
Citation
No. 10665530
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1847
GUY CRAIG; THE LAW OFFICE OF GUY M. CRAIG, LLC; RICHARD J.
HACKERMAN; MARK LEIFER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
KRUNCHCASH, LLC; GABRIEL BERG; MATTHEW S. STURTZ; NELSON,
MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP; KENNEDY BERG, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ZVI GUTTMAN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-02200-GLR)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
ON BRIEF: Richard J. Hackerman, RICHARD J. HACKERMAN, P.A., Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellants. Jeffrey J. Hines, David F. Shea, GOODELL, DEVRIES,
LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Nelson Mullins Riley &
Scarborough LLP.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Guy Craig, the Law Office of Guy M. Craig, LLC, Richard J. Hackerman, and Mark
Leifer appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy
court’s order dismissing their adversary proceeding against KrunchCash, LLC, Gabriel
Berg, Kennedy Berg, Matthew Scott Sturtz, and Nelson, Mullins, Riley, & Scarborough,
LLP, which they filed in the three consolidated bankruptcy cases filed by law firms
operated by Jonathan and Perry Resnick. We have reviewed the record and the arguments
presented on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Craig v. KrunchCash, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-02200-GLR (D. Md.
July 13, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.