FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10600066
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Grant Mandigora v. M. Capra

No. 10600066 · Decided June 5, 2025
No. 10600066 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
June 5, 2025
Citation
No. 10600066
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1292 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1292 GRANT MANDIGORA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. CAPRA, Fairfax County Police Department Officer, badge number 372291; KRISTINA JORDAN, Fairfax County Department of Child Protective Services Social Services Specialist III; MANFIELD MANDIGORA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00245-LMB-LRV) Submitted: June 3, 2025 Decided: June 5, 2025 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Grant Mandigora, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1292 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Grant Mandigora appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Mandigora v. Capra, No. 1:25- cv-00245-LMB-LRV (E.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2025). To the extent Mandigora requested that that the court interfere with state court proceedings, the district court properly abstained from exercising jurisdiction. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 (1971) (holding federal courts should abstain from exercising jurisdiction over matters related to ongoing state judicial proceedings, based on notions of federalism and comity). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny as moot Mandigora’s motions for injunctive relief pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1292 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1292 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Grant Mandigora v. M. Capra in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 5, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10600066 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →