FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10587529
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Glenda Falwell v. Michael Chapman

No. 10587529 · Decided May 19, 2025
No. 10587529 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2025
Citation
No. 10587529
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2187 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2187 GLENDA FALWELL; KEVIN FALWELL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN; LOUDOUN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; KELLY MAIO, MH Clinician; DR. RICHARD CONNOR; LOUDOUN COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT; RASHIKA J. RENTIE; ERIC SHARINS; KAREN E. KIRKPATRICK; BUTA BIBERAJ, Prosecutor; STEWART MARCANTEL, Deputy; JUSTIN M. SPERLING, Deputy; BRANDON NOLAN, Officer; VICTORIA C. DRONSICK, Magistrate, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01851-LMB-WBP) Submitted: May 15, 2025 Decided: May 19, 2025 Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenda Falwell, Kevin Falwell, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-2187 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Glenda Falwell and Keith Falwell seek to appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice and granting them leave to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2187 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2187 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Glenda Falwell v. Michael Chapman in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10587529 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →