Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/Francis Beidler Ii, as Sole Surviving Director and Trustee in Liquidation Of, and Suing by the Name of Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, and Mrs. Elizabeth Beidler Carton as Acting Codirector and Co-Trustee in the Same v. Harry H. Veno, Harry Veno v. Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, a Corporation in Liquidation
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 259167
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Francis Beidler Ii, as Sole Surviving Director and Trustee in Liquidation Of, and Suing by the Name of Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, and Mrs. Elizabeth Beidler Carton as Acting Codirector and Co-Trustee in the Same v. Harry H. Veno, Harry Veno v. Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, a Corporation in Liquidation
No. 259167 · Decided December 18, 1962
No. 259167·Fourth Circuit · 1962·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
December 18, 1962
Citation
No. 259167
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Francis Beidler Ii, as Sole Surviving Director and Trustee in Liquidation Of, and Suing by the Name of Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, and Mrs. Elizabeth Beidler Carton as Acting Codirector and Co-Trustee in the Same v. Harry H. Veno, Harry Veno v. Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, a Corporation in Liquidation is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Francis Beidler Ii, as Sole Surviving Director and Trustee in Liquidation Of, and Suing by the Name of Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, and Mrs. Elizabeth Beidler Carton as Acting Codirector and Co-Trustee in the Same v. Harry H. Veno, Harry Veno v. Santee River Cypress Lumber Company, a Corporation in Liquidation in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 18, 1962.
Use the citation No. 259167 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.