Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. County of Hanover, Virginia, and United States Army Corps of Engineers, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, and County of Hanover, Virginia, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 781519
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. County of Hanover, Virginia, and United States Army Corps of Engineers, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, and County of Hanover, Virginia, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting
No. 781519 · Decided March 27, 2003
No. 781519·Fourth Circuit · 2003·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 27, 2003
Citation
No. 781519
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. County of Hanover, Virginia, and United States Army Corps of Engineers, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, and County of Hanover, Virginia, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. County of Hanover, Virginia, and United States Army Corps of Engineers, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting Frances Broaddus Crutchfield Henry Ruffin Broaddus v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, and County of Hanover, Virginia, Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce Hanover Business Council Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, Incorporated (Vamwa), Amici Supporting in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 27, 2003.
Use the citation No. 781519 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.