FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8697652
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice

No. 8697652 · Decided August 29, 2016
No. 8697652 · Fourth Circuit · 2016 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
August 29, 2016
Citation
No. 8697652
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, No. 4:15-cv-00121-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Plain English Summary
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 29, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8697652 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →