Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8696082
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Davis v. Chasse
No. 8696082 · Decided February 29, 2016
No. 8696082·Fourth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
February 29, 2016
Citation
No. 8696082
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen 22 closed civil cases. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Chasse, No. 4:11-cv-00020-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va. July 16, 2015). We deny Davis’ motions to remand and motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.
Plain English Summary
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Key Points
01Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
02PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen 22 closed civil cases.
03Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
04We deny Davis’ motions to remand and motions for appointment of counsel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Davis v. Chasse in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 29, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8696082 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.