Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10666416
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
David Hill v. Paul McNulty
No. 10666416 · Decided September 3, 2025
No. 10666416·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 3, 2025
Citation
No. 10666416
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6308
DAVID E. HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL J. MCNULTY, U.S. District Attorney; ROBERT SPENCER, Asst. U.S.
Attorney; KAREN NESTER, FBI Agent; PAUL TIMKO, FBI Agent; JANE DOE,
Warden, D.C. Jail; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE, Correctional
Officer; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; ALEXANDRIA DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, U.S. Attorney Office; GERALD B. LEE, Former Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00112-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order denying, pursuant to a prior prefiling
injunction, Hill’s requests for leave to file motions for relief from judgment in the
underlying civil rights action.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hill v. McNulty, No. 1:21-cv-00112-
CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
We deny Hill’s motion to disqualify Senior Judge Hilton from this and Hill’s other
cases and to retroactively vacate several of Judge Hilton’s orders because of the alleged
conflict.
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02Attorney; KAREN NESTER, FBI Agent; PAUL TIMKO, FBI Agent; JANE DOE, Warden, D.C.
03Jail; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; ALEXANDRIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, U.S.
04(1:21-cv-00112-CMH-IDD) Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025 Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for David Hill v. Paul McNulty in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 3, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10666416 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.