FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10666416
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

David Hill v. Paul McNulty

No. 10666416 · Decided September 3, 2025
No. 10666416 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 3, 2025
Citation
No. 10666416
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6308 DAVID E. HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL J. MCNULTY, U.S. District Attorney; ROBERT SPENCER, Asst. U.S. Attorney; KAREN NESTER, FBI Agent; PAUL TIMKO, FBI Agent; JANE DOE, Warden, D.C. Jail; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; ALEXANDRIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, U.S. Attorney Office; GERALD B. LEE, Former Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00112-CMH-IDD) Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025 Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order denying, pursuant to a prior prefiling injunction, Hill’s requests for leave to file motions for relief from judgment in the underlying civil rights action.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hill v. McNulty, No. 1:21-cv-00112- CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We deny Hill’s motion to disqualify Senior Judge Hilton from this and Hill’s other cases and to retroactively vacate several of Judge Hilton’s orders because of the alleged conflict. 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for David Hill v. Paul McNulty in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 3, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10666416 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →