Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10588423
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Curtis Richardson v. Kaitlin Cook
No. 10588423 · Decided May 20, 2025
No. 10588423·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
May 20, 2025
Citation
No. 10588423
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7160 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7160
CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis Richardson, #269166, a/k/a Curtis D.
Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Richardson, #28507-171,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAITLIN COOK, Horry County Solicitor, in her individual and official capacity;
LORIS POLICE DEPARTMENT; D. S. WILKES; PFC SAUER, Loris Police
Officer; HORRY COUNTY; SOUTH CAROLINA; CITY OF LORIS; JR LONG
DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL STAFF SUPERVISOR; HORRY COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:23-cv-06959-JD)
Submitted: May 15, 2025 Decided: May 20, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7160 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Richardson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Richardson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Richardson’s motion to add claims and parties and affirm the district court’s order.
Richardson v. Cook, No. 4:23-cv-06959-JD, (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7160 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 24-7160 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.