Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/Continental Cablevision of New England, Inc. v. United Broadcasting Company Suburban Bank, D/B/A Sovran Bank/maryland, as It is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton, and Grover B. Russell, Jr., as He is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 522188
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Continental Cablevision of New England, Inc. v. United Broadcasting Company Suburban Bank, D/B/A Sovran Bank/maryland, as It is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton, and Grover B. Russell, Jr., as He is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton
No. 522188 · Decided May 25, 1989
No. 522188·Fourth Circuit · 1989·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
May 25, 1989
Citation
No. 522188
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Continental Cablevision of New England, Inc. v. United Broadcasting Company Suburban Bank, D/B/A Sovran Bank/maryland, as It is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton, and Grover B. Russell, Jr., as He is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Continental Cablevision of New England, Inc. v. United Broadcasting Company Suburban Bank, D/B/A Sovran Bank/maryland, as It is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton, and Grover B. Russell, Jr., as He is Co-Trustee of the Residuary Trust Established Under the Will of Richard Eaton in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 25, 1989.
Use the citation No. 522188 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.