Christina Moore v. Harrisonburg Police Department

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1216 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1216 CHRISTINA MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARRISONBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; EX-CHIEF KELLY WARNER; LIEUTENANT TODD MILLER; DETECTIVE BRADLEY MATTHIAS; SERGEANT MEGAN LAPREVOTTE; DETECTIVE JONATHAN SNODDY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Jasmine Hyejung Yoon, District Judge. (5:24-cv-00109-JHY-JCH) Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 17, 2025 Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christina Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1216 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christina Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. 1 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that the relevant statutes of limitations barred Moore’s claims. 2 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Moore v. Harrisonburg Police Dep’t, No. 5:24-cv-00109-JHY-JCH (W.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 1 The district court’s order is final and appealable because the court did not grant leave to amend the complaint. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order). 2 Contrary to Moore’s assertion on appeal, she is not entitled to equitable tolling of the limitations period. See Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez, 572 U.S. 1, 10 (2014) (explaining that equitable tolling applies “when a litigant has pursued [her] rights diligently but some extraordinary circumstance prevents [her] from bringing a timely action”). 2