Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8478461
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brown v. Patrick
No. 8478461 · Decided April 3, 2012
No. 8478461·Fourth Circuit · 2012·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 3, 2012
Citation
No. 8478461
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, No. 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 2, 2011; entered Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P.
Key Points
01PER CURIAM: Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P.
0260(b) motion, and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense.
03Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
04We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Brown v. Patrick in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 3, 2012.
Use the citation No. 8478461 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.