FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10646385
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Brent Creekmore v. FMCS

No. 10646385 · Decided July 31, 2025
No. 10646385 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2025
Citation
No. 10646385
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1204 BRENT CREEKMORE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. (10- 2024-63) Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: July 31, 2025 Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brent Creekmore, Petitioner Pro Se. Courtney Lynn Dixon, Jaynie Lilley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil Rights Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Brent Creekmore petitions for review of a decision of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”) denying his request for correction pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and 49 C.F.R. § 10.41 (2024). The Privacy Act provides that Creekmore must challenge the FMCSA’s decision in an appropriate district court. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(A); see 49 C.F.R. § 10.51(b) (2024). We thus conclude that we lack jurisdiction over Creekmore’s petition and dismiss it. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED * Although the FMCSA contends on appeal that Creekmore has not exhausted his administrative remedies because he failed to seek reconsideration of the FMCSA’s decision, we do not reach that issue. We also decline to transfer Creekmore’s petition for review to an appropriate district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631. 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Brent Creekmore v. FMCS in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10646385 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →