Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10646385
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brent Creekmore v. FMCS
No. 10646385 · Decided July 31, 2025
No. 10646385·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2025
Citation
No. 10646385
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1204
BRENT CREEKMORE,
Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. (10-
2024-63)
Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: July 31, 2025
Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brent Creekmore, Petitioner Pro Se. Courtney Lynn Dixon, Jaynie Lilley, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil Rights Division, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Brent Creekmore petitions for review of a decision of the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration (“FMCSA”) denying his request for correction pursuant to the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and 49 C.F.R. § 10.41 (2024). The Privacy Act
provides that Creekmore must challenge the FMCSA’s decision in an appropriate district
court. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(A); see 49 C.F.R. § 10.51(b) (2024). We thus conclude that
we lack jurisdiction over Creekmore’s petition and dismiss it. * We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
*
Although the FMCSA contends on appeal that Creekmore has not exhausted his
administrative remedies because he failed to seek reconsideration of the FMCSA’s
decision, we do not reach that issue. We also decline to transfer Creekmore’s petition for
review to an appropriate district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
03(10- 2024-63) Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: July 31, 2025 Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
04Courtney Lynn Dixon, Jaynie Lilley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil Rights Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1204 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Brent Creekmore v. FMCS in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10646385 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.