Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8696306
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss
No. 8696306 · Decided April 25, 2016
No. 8696306·Fourth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 25, 2016
Citation
No. 8696306
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, 'Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations to dismiss her claims after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgments. Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss, No. 3:15-cv-01784-TLW, 2015 WL 4487759 (D.S.C. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015); Assa’ad-Faltas v. Weiss, No. 3:15-cv-03186-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.
Plain English Summary
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Key Points
01Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
02PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, 'Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations to dismiss her claims after a 28 U.S.C.
03Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgments.
04filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015); Assa’ad-Faltas v.
Frequently Asked Questions
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 25, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8696306 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.