FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10368020
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Andrew Dicks v. Ronald Weber

No. 10368020 · Decided March 27, 2025
No. 10368020 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 27, 2025
Citation
No. 10368020
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7085 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-7085 ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RONALD S. WEBER, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02219-LKG) Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 29, 2025 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Joseph Dicks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-7085 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/29/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Andrew Joseph Dicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition without prejudice as successive and unauthorized. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its order on September 12, 2024, so the appeal period expired on October 15. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C) (relevant counting rule). Dicks wrote on his notice of appeal that he filed the document on September 19 and certified that he sent a copy to the Maryland Office of the Attorney General the same day. The envelope, however, was stamped by the United States Postal Service on November 4 and by prison officials on November 6. Due to this conflicting evidence, we cannot determine whether Dicks timely filed his notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1)(A); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (establishing prison mailbox rule). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining when Dicks delivered his notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing to the court. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7085 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7085 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Andrew Dicks v. Ronald Weber in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 27, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10368020 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →