Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8477695
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Amr v. Virginia State University
No. 8477695 · Decided March 19, 2012
No. 8477695·Fourth Circuit · 2012·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 19, 2012
Citation
No. 8477695
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint with prejudice and granting the Defendants’ motions for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Virginia State Univ., No. 3:10-cv-00787-REP-MHL, 2011 WL 4407429 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2011). Amr’s pending motion to hold appeal in abeyance is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED.
Plain English Summary
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Key Points
01Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
02Amr appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint with prejudice and granting the Defendants’ motions for sanctions.
03Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
04Amr’s pending motion to hold appeal in abeyance is denied as moot.
Frequently Asked Questions
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Amr v. Virginia State University in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 19, 2012.
Use the citation No. 8477695 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.