Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company v. National Labor Relations Board Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, National Labor Relations Board v. Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 746851
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company v. National Labor Relations Board Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, National Labor Relations Board v. Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company
No. 746851 · Decided September 11, 1997
No. 746851·Fourth Circuit · 1997·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 11, 1997
Citation
No. 746851
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company v. National Labor Relations Board Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, National Labor Relations Board v. Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company v. National Labor Relations Board Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, National Labor Relations Board v. Alpo Petfoods, Incorporated Friskies Petcare, a Division of the Nestle Food Company in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 11, 1997.
Use the citation No. 746851 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.