FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10349681
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Abir Ali v. Esker Tatum

No. 10349681 · Decided March 3, 2025
No. 10349681 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 3, 2025
Citation
No. 10349681
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6527 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6527 ABIR ALI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ESKER LEE TATUM, Warden; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00073-DJN-MRC) Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025 Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abir Ali, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6527 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Abir Ali, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with the court’s prior order directing Ali to pay the partial filing fee. ∗ Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, shortly after entry of the dismissal order, Ali demonstrated his attempt to timely comply with the payment order and paid the fee. The district court thus vacated the dismissal order and reinstated Ali’s § 1983 complaint. Ali’s § 1983 action remains ongoing in the district court. Because the district court effectively granted Ali the only relief he could have obtained on appeal, we dismiss this appeal as moot. CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v. Wynne, 792 F.3d 469, 474 (4th Cir. 2015) (“Litigation may become moot during the pendency of an appeal when an intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant effective relief to the prevailing party.”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED ∗ The order of dismissal without prejudice is a final, appealable order because the court did not grant leave to amend. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc). 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6527 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6527 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Abir Ali v. Esker Tatum in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 3, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10349681 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →