Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2617, Pens. Plan Guide P 23903e Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Tru-Tech, Inc. D. Grant Peacock, and Grant Peacock and Company, Inc. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 681607
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2617, Pens. Plan Guide P 23903e Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Tru-Tech, Inc. D. Grant Peacock, and Grant Peacock and Company, Inc. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
No. 681607 · Decided November 4, 1994
No. 681607·Fourth Circuit · 1994·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
November 4, 1994
Citation
No. 681607
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2617, Pens. Plan Guide P 23903e Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Tru-Tech, Inc. D. Grant Peacock, and Grant Peacock and Company, Inc. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2617, Pens. Plan Guide P 23903e Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. D. Grant Peacock, and Alan H. Finegold, Jack L. Thomas, Individually, on Behalf of the Tru-Tech, Incorporated Pension Plan, and as a Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Tru-Tech, Inc. D. Grant Peacock, and Grant Peacock and Company, Inc. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 4, 1994.
Use the citation No. 681607 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.